Tag Archive | "abbey road"

Breaking News: How much is Abbey Road studio worth?


By Peter Lindblad
Join the ConversationThe online world is “a-twitter” with discussions about Abbey Road studios and their future. Click here to join the Twitterverse conversations related to Abbey Road.

How much is Abbey Road worth?

If reports are true that EMI is putting the famed London recording studios up for sale to ease its debt problems, the world could find out soon.

The Financial Times reported Tuesday that EMI is, indeed, putting Abbey Road, one of the most hallowed studios in music history, on the market. The Beatles, of course, named their final album after the street of the same name, and after the LP’s release, the studio was renamed Abbey Road.

So far, according to the Financial Times, EMI is being tight-lipped about the possible sale of the St. John’s Wood property. Muddying the waters further is the question of whether EMI would sell the Abbey Road brand with it.
In 1929, EMI purchased the house at number 3 Abbey Road for £100,000 ($160,000), and it would later house the world’s first custom-built recording studios, according to the Financial Times.

Long before The Beatles entered the picture, Sir Edward Elgar recorded “Land of Hope and Glory” in Studio One in 1931 with the London Symphony Orchestra. During World War II, the British government and BBC Radio used the facilities for propaganda recordings.

However, it was The Beatles who made the studios famous, recording almost all of their records there between 1962 and 1969. And when it came time to remaster the entire Beatles catalog for release in 2009, EMI used Abbey Road studios.

After The Beatles broke up, Abbey Road didn’t sit dormant. Pink Floyd recorded its seminal Dark Side Of The Moon LP there, and in more recent years, Radiohead, Oasis and Blur have used the studios to record many of their albums.

Reportedly, the reason EMI is considering selling the property is to alleviate some of the debt the company was saddled with as a result of Terra Firma’s 2007 leveraged buy-out. That’s according to the Financial Times, which also reports that Terra Firma wants $188 million from investors by June to avoid breaching covenants on $5.17 billion of loans from Citigroup. Chances are, however, that any sale of Abbey Road would not happen soon enough or bring in the kind of money needed to have a great impact on EMI’s debt problems.

Abbey Road’s significance as a recording studio has waned in recent years as technological advancements have allowed artists to record more cheaply on their own using  laptap computers. The same goes for a lot of record labels who, in the past, have used their own expensive recording infrastructure to record acts.

Still, Abbey Road does have one advantage: It has the facilities to accommodate full orchestras, and that’s made it attractive for producers looking to score films like “Lord Of The Rings.”

Related Posts:

Posted in ArticlesComments (0)

Going ‘Eye 2 Eye’ with Alan Parsons



by Peter Lindblad

Alan Parsons was only 18 years old when he went to work as a staff engineer at Abbey Road Studios.

He got his big break when he earned a credit for his involvement in the making of The Beatles’ “Abbey Road” LP. Doors opened wide for the talented studio wunderkind after that.

His sonic mastery would helps shape records by Paul McCartney and Wings, Al Stewart (Time Passages” and “Year Of The Cat,” among others) and Pilot. But it was with Pink Floyd’s “Dark Side Of The Moon” that Parsons reached for the heavens.

As the studio architect behind the Alan Parsons Project, with partner Eric Woolfson handling the songwriting chores and a revolving collective of musicians lending their assistance, Parsons made a name for himself as a recording artist. From 1975 to 1984, the Project made hit album after hit album, scoring with smash singles like “Eye In The Sky,” “I Wouldn’t Want To Be Like You,” “Breakdown” and “Games People Play.”

A new Frontiers Records CD/DVD release, “Eye 2 Eye — Live In Madrid,” filmed and recorded at the Plaza Mayor in Madrid, Spain, on May 14, 2004, is the first-ever concert video for the Alan Parsons Project. Parsons talked about his new projects and his career in this interview.

I wanted you to talk about the new CD/DVD live project.
Alan Parsons: Well, there’s never been a video release of the band. So this is a first, really. We have had live albums before. We did a live album in the mid-’90s, but this is the first in a long time, and it’s the first featuring the American band I worked with ’til the end of last year. But the material is perhaps a little bit to be expected. We went through the hits from the albums.

The atmosphere of the surroundings must be a little different from most places you play these days, being surrounded by such historic buildings.
Parsons:
Yeah, I mean, you don’t get a lot of concerts in public squares in American cities (laughs). Yeah, it’s pretty unusual. We did one in Guadalajara. We did a city square that was quite similar. But this was a real find, a real gem of a place to play. And it was captured on video, which was the best part of it.

It was for a TV show, so I guess you knew it was going to be released at some point.
Parsons:
Well, I just thought it was a live TV show, with a couple of follow-up broadcasts. You know, we work hard to improve it and re-edit it, and co-produce it, and it came out really well.

I wanted to also talk to you about “The Art And Science of Sound Recording” videos you’ve been doing. This is really an interesting thing for music fans, who probably still  don’t know what exactly goes on in the studio. Was there something that made you want to demystify the process for people?
Parsons:
Yeah, I think there’s a need to have people with the kind of experience that I’ve had, to get firsthand knowledge on video like this. And when you see the program, you’ll see that it’s not just me. It’s a bunch of engineers, producers, artists describing their experiences, and it’s just designed to be kind of a recording encyclopedia on video.

And we’ve gone into a lot of effort … we’ve gone into high-definition. There’s no expense left in terms of the layout, the graphics and the content. It’s a professional job all the way around. And we’re hoping to get interest from the audio recording schools and from universities, and really anybody who has any kind of interest in recording at home, or is in a band. Everybody that plays in a band almost by definition must have some interest in this.

And you were able to get Billy Bob Thornton to narrate. Had you been friends with him?
Parsons:
Yeah, that was a real coup. It’s probably mostly because of our music connection — we have a band and he has a band called The Boxmasters. He’s got his own studio at home. That’s where we recorded his voice. That was a great find, and he was so gracious and so nice about the whole thing, and he just sailed through it. It took an afternoon, the whole thing — seminars, narration in an afternoon. Not seminars and narration. Narration for seminars for the programming.

You worked at such a young age on “Abbey Road.” What were your experiences like with studio work leading up to that?
Parsons: Well, I was a trainee. I was just a new boy really — just learning from the ground up, learning from all the engineers there. And I’d done a few other sessions, you know, [with] various other artists, various pop bands, various orchestral sessions, classical sessions … “Abbey Road” was such a mecca for music of all kinds, you know.

One minute you’d be doing a progressive hair band, and the next you’d be doing stage musicals or something — really strange, really diverse mixture of musical projects. It was a great experience, but you know, The Beatles … obviously, a big moment for me when I was sent down to Apple to work with them for the first time.

How intimidating was it?
Parsons: Oh, very. I mean, I just walk into this room and there’s George Martin and four Beatles, and Glyn Johns and I say, “Oh, excuse me, I’m Alan. I’ve come to help you.” Yeah, it was pretty intimidating, but a day I’ll never forget.

As it went on, did you become more comfortable with them, and did you have any interaction with them?
Parsons: Well, you know, my time with The Beatles as a band was really … I was feeling very green, very junior. I’d be more likely to be making tea or coffee than doing anything else more creative than that. But the nice thing is that I established at least a kind of relationship [with them], because I went on to work with Paul on his own solo stuff later.

As far as a learning experience, what did you take from that work that you carried on to future projects?
Parsons:
Well, you know, every artist you work with is an experience in itself. You learn from the producer. You learn from the artist the techniques that are used and you borrow from them. Every moment is an influence.

What was Al Stewart like to work with?
Parsons:
Well, I still believe to this day that he’s one of the greatest living songwriters. He’s an incredible lyricist and incredible historian, and a lovely guy, a very talented artist.

He fits into a certain market, and “Year Of The Cat,” obviously, was a big success. We hit the right time, the right song, the right market, and the right saxophone player (laughs, referring to Phil Kenzie). So yeah, it was a good experience. I think possibly Al wanted me to continue to work with him, but I felt that after three albums with him, he and I really had achieved everything that I wanted to achieve with him. I decided to concentrate on other things at that point.

And working with Pink Floyd on Dark Side of The Moon, you’re experimenting …
Parsons:
Now, you’re going back in history … (laughs)

Yeah, I guess I’m jumping around a bit (laughs)
Parsons:
Yeah, ’72.

Right. Working with them, that must have been a liberating experience I guess for all of you to really try different things and push the boundaries. Did they go in and talk with you before everything started and say this is an album where we’re going to try everything?
Parsons:
No, not in the least. I mean, they were … I had done some work with them on “Meddle” and on “Atom Heart Mother,” as well. I think it just dictated its own parameters and paces. We just worked together to get the best result, and I’m often asked, did I know what a great piece of work we were making? And the answer is, I had no idea. No, even [Pink Floyd’s] Roger [Waters] said that [he] knew it was going to be a big album, but I don’t think anybody could have really predicted that it would still be on the charts 30 years later.

Is there something about that album that you worked on specifically that you’re the most proud of?
Parsons:
Well, I came up with a couple of ideas. I mean, one of the ideas was to take on Clare Torry to sing “Great Gig In The Sky.” She was a session singer that I’d worked with, and Floyd wouldn’t have taken her on if it hadn’t been for my suggestion. And the clocks on “Time.” That was the result of some work I’d done in a little antique shop and [I] said, hey, how about some ticking clocks at this point? And they said, yeah, of course. So I did it, and they loved the idea. All these things made me feel good.

Conversely, was there any idea you had that you thought would have been really great for the album that didn’t make it?
Parsons:
I felt pretty happy with it. I mean, there was some narration that I tried at the end of “Great Gig In The Sky” that was, I think, an American astronaut — Neil Armstrong or somebody — just talking down to the Earth from the moon or something, and it was very quiet, so you could barely hear it. But that was an idea of mine that got, you know, forgotten about — quietly forgotten about. But I have no regrets about that album at all.

Yeah, I guess it would be hard to have any regrets about that one (laughs). Working with Eric on the Alan Parsons Project, how did you come to know him, and what made you two a really good team? What made that chemistry work?
Parsons:
Well, he was a very talented songwriter, and I used, hopefully, my talent as a producer to work with those songs, and that’s what it was. He was the songwriter, and I was the producer. I was in charge of the recording, and he was in charge of the songwriting, and that made a good team.

You didn’t tour or play live very often. Was it just because you were using so many studio musicians, and it was hard to settle on a group that could play live?
Parsons:
Yeah, well, we didn’t tour at all. I mean, Eric and I were never on a stage together. I think we were just dedicated to the notion that the Alan Parsons Project was not a touring band. It was just a studio band. And yes, you’re right. The lush orchestrations and stuff would have made playing live very difficult, until the technology came along to make it realistic.

You embraced the notion of music videos, too. What drew you to that medium?
Parsons:
Well, just the … in the MTV heyday, there was enormous pressure on everybody to make videos, although we obviously didn’t do performance videos. But I think directors liked us because they were let loose on something they could pretty much put their stamp on anything without having to deal with an artist (laughs).

It was kind of interesting. I mean, I remember on “Prime Time,” I submitted my ideas, and the story board was essentially my creation on that video, but most of the time, we just left it to the director to come up with something. “Don’t Answer Me,” I think, was brilliant. “Don’t Answer Me” was the animated Dick Tracy-style cartoon video, and I think it won some kind of award, “Best Video of the Year” award, or something on MTV.

I just want you to, if you could, state your thoughts about some of the Alan Parsons Project albums, starting with “Tales Of Mystery And Imagination” (1975).
Parsons:
Well, first album, first of its kind, first album with my name on it — just felt really good, and it still, to this day, remains my firm favorite.

Why is that?
Parsons:
Just that it was the first, and I was able to … you know, it was something that established the identity of the Project. It was the beginning, and it paved the way for everything that came after that.

“I, Robot.”
Parsons: Well, it was the follow-up record. It was the first for Arista, Clive Davis. And I think it worked all as a conceptual piece. We had a good, strong radio single with “Wouldn’t Want To Be Like You,” and “Breakdown,” as well. “Breakdown” got airplay. I think it works as both an album, and we had good FM-radio singles.

And “Pyramid.
Parsons:
I felt good about “Pyramid.” I think that it was conceptually one of the strongest of the first three. It was very focused on the “Pyramid” theme.

“Eve.
Parsons:
It wasn’t my favorite of the albums, to be honest with you. Although we had an instrumental track from the album called “Lucifer” that was No. 1 in Germany, and the album itself was No. 1 in Germany, so it was arguably one of our biggest successes in Europe. But it wasn’t my favorite of all the albums — probably the least favorite of them.

I’ll just finish up with two more: “Turn Of A Friendly Card” and “Eye In The Sky.
Parsons: Uh, “Turn of A Friendly Card” we recorded in Paris very quickly. It was done in a short period of time, probably because we were staying in hotels (laughs) and probably didn’t want to spend too much money. But really, I think that was a great album, and I think the title track, you know, we divided into several songs, and it became a classic amongst the fans. We were pressured … well, not pressured, but we were asked by the fans to include the entire piece on the recent compilation album, the “Essential …,” which we did. And we’ve actually been playing it live as a piece on the recent tour of Europe and Russia.

And “Eye in The Sky.
Parsons: Well, “Eye in The Sky,” that was arguably our biggest success in America. We had a big hit single and the intro to “Eye In The Sky,” which is called “Sirius,” is arguably the best-known piece of Project music ever, because it became a basketball anthem. So I’m very proud of that.

Were you surprised that “Sirius” was adopted by so many sports teams to use as their introduction?
Parsons: Oh, very surprised and delighted in particular, this year, just a couple of months ago, when the New Orleans Saints used it as their walk-on music to the Super Bowl, and then they won the game. That was great. That was great fun.

What do you think, as far as advancements in recording technology, what’s been the most significant or important change in recording technology that you’ve seen in your lifetime?
Parsons: Well, I really think it’s the transfer from tape to hard disc. Everything changed at that point when you were able to access any point in a recording without rewinding tape and finding a place and loading up tape. Everything suddenly became instant access, and that really changed the whole face of recording.

Do you still get the same thrill out of working in the studio that you always have?
Parsons:
I still enjoy recording, yes. I mean, it’s a different world now. Studios are smaller. My own studio is not a big thing. But that’s because, you know, the technology is contained in smaller spaces now. All you need is a computer and a console. I mean, you can … there are still commercial studios with giant consoles out there, but, you know, they’re fighting to survive. But yeah, I still feel good about making records. I still enjoy the process.

I guess with the whole proposed sale of “Abbey Road” that came up earlier this year, do you miss those days of recording in that studio?
Parsons:
Oh, very much. It was my home for 20 years. Yes, I do miss it. If EMI ever sells it to property developers, they should be ashamed of themselves.

And The Beatles breakup?
Parsons: I think I saw it coming. I saw it coming with the “Abbey Road” album. They were essentially a broken-up band already. They weren’t working together. They were working as individuals. It really didn’t surprise me. It saddened me. But it really didn’t surprise me.

What else are you working on these days?
Parsons:
Well, I’m still working on the “Science” as we speak. I’m just putting the finishing touches to the final versions of everything, really. That’s the nice thing about having it online. It’s not final, until it’s final. And then when we eventually commit to DVD, then it will be finalized. But we’re not quite finished yet. We’ve still got a few sections to polish up and finish off. So, that’s what we’re doing, and I’m hoping … Oh, and let me tell you another thing, there was a song recorded especially for the program called “All Our Yesterdays.” And that’s coming out in a couple of weeks on iTunes, and it’s available online from the Web site. So in the program, you see that develop from scratch, almost from the initial writing of it right to the final mix. That’s going to be interesting. And it will eventually become part of an album I might or might not get into later this year. I have plans to record, but I may not get to it ’til next year.


Related Posts:

Posted in Articles, Backstage PassComments (0)

Inside the making of The Beatles’ ‘Abbey Road’ Part 1


By  Dave Thompson

The entire Beatles catalog, including Abbey Road, has been digitally remastered for CD release in Sept. 2009. (©Apple Corps Ltd., 2009)

The entire Beatles catalog, including Abbey Road, has been digitally remastered for CD release in Sept. 2009. (©Apple Corps Ltd., 2009)
It is one of the most iconic images in The Beatles’ entire catalog, and one of the last that we would ever see of them as a group.

Four Beatles in a row, crossing the black-and-white zebra crossing on Abbey Road, one be-denimed and so serious-looking, one barefoot and smoking; one simply looking to keep up with his friends and the fourth in white, hands in pocket and his face swathed in hair.

No matter that they were making their way to exactly the same studio they had been using their entire career, they had come a long way from the four smartly smiling Moptops who waved out of the cover of their first LP, and a long way, too, from the all-for-one unity that bound them together back then. Abbey Road, as they titled their latest LP, would not be the last new Beatles album to be released — that honor would fall to the soundtrack to the “Let It Be” movie. But it was the last LP they would ever record together, and if the word “together” hangs awkwardly at the end of any sentence involving the latter-day Beatles, that is because it’s the last word that could describe them.

Yet, amid all the gloom and recriminations that flew around the end of The Beatles, and the sheer finality of a track listing that concluded with a song called “The End,” Abbey Road stands as perhaps the most cohesive of all The Beatles albums since Revolver. Yes, the White Album is more atmospheric, Sgt. Pepper is more lauded and Magical Mystery Tour is more mystifying. But from the opening warning, “Here comes old Flat Top,” to the closing chord that edges onto the label, Abbey Road not only features some of the group’s most ambitious songwriting and arrangements, it also offers a summation of everything the band had been striving for throughout the previous three years. Everything, that is, apart from the reconciliation that would allow John, Paul, George and Ringo to continue working together.

Misery loves company

In terms of chronological taping, the first sign that there might be a new Beatles album gelling around the chaos of the Get Back sessions, as Let It Be was originally known, came Jan. 2, 1969, the very first day of the sessions, when John introduced a new song, “Sun King,” to the proceedings.

That early in the process, of course, its presence was meaningless — every song that was brought to the movie set was a new one, and that same day had already seen George’s “All Things Must Pass” and John’s “Dig A Pony” unveiled to the watching cameras and tapes. But as time passed and the final shape and nature of the movie’s contents started to make themselves apparent, it was clear, too, that The Beatles had far move useful material on hand than Get Back could accommodate.

“Maxwell’s Silver Hammer,” “Oh Darling,” “Octopus’s Garden,” “Mean Mr. Mustard” and “Polythene Pam” (both of which Lennon originally wrote during The Beatles’ visit to Rishikesh the previous year), “She Came In Through The Bathroom Window,” “Golden Slumbers” (whose lyric McCartney borrowed from the 17th century poet Thomas Dekker), “Carry That Weight” and “Her Majesty” were all roughed out during the Twickenham Studio sessions, which themselves stretched throughout the month of January.

The sessions themselves were, John Lennon later sighed, “hell … the most miserable sessions on earth.” In the history of The Beatles, added George Harrison, they represented “an all-time low.” But the songs that the quartet brought to the sessions, and which they were now to take out of them again, could not help but benefit from their exposure to this harsh environment. For the first time since they gave up touring, The Beatles — or at least some combination of the individual members — were playing together live, and no matter that the audience was largely made up of cameramen and technicians, their songs were taught to breathe and grow.

Of course, it was in an attempt to recapture that “in concert” feeling that Paul McCartney hatched the movie scheme in the first place; he wanted the band to return to their roots, a rock ’n’ roll combo that kicked ass in concert, with Get Back, both on record and film, capturing that ass kicking for all time — remember, there were no truly listenable recordings of the “live” Beatles in existence at that time; either the shows were drowned out by screaming, as with the long-since mothballed Hollywood Bowl tapes, or were captured in the lowest of lo-fi, as was the case with the Star Club tapes. The fact that future generations would find both of these acceptable for release is immaterial. They were not a sound that The Beatles wished to be remembered by.

Neither, as it turned out, was Get Back, which was why the project was subjected to so many delays and disagreements before the bulk of it was handed over to Phil Spector for remixing; the so-called “naked’ version of Let It Be that was released in 2003 shows what a mess The Beatles themselves had left the album in. That was not a fate that their next LP could be allowed to share, and so The Beatles did the other thing that a great rock ’n’ roll band should do. They broke in the songs in the live environment, then took them into the studio to perfect. The result is the most natural and positive-sounding record they had made again since Revolver.

Despite the acrimony that was slowly devouring The Beatles during the first half of 1969, the group remained busy. In April, John and Paul alone recorded “The Ballad Of John And Yoko” and proved that their friendship could survive the problems that were consuming their professional relationship. True, some people balked at the self-serving nature of Lennon’s lyric (and title), but the performance itself was exemplary, and “The Ballad Of John and Yoko” remains one of The Beatles’ greatest latter-day achievements. Interestingly, it was also destined to become their final U.K. #1 hit single. Neither “Something”/“Come Together,” which followed toward the end of the year (#4) nor “Let It Be” (#2) would taste such heights.

It was the ease with which this single came together that encouraged McCartney and Lennon to return to the studio just a couple of days later, this time with their bandmates accompanying them — Ringo Starr was filming “The Magic Christian” at the time of the “Ballad Of John And Yoko” session, and Harrison was apparently “out of the country,” which may or may not have been a euphemism for other forms of unavailability.

But now they were back, and the quartet reunited at Abbey Road April 16, 1969, to record two of Harrison’s recent compositions: “Old Brown Shoe” and an early draft of the spectral beauty of “Something” — a song which Harrison wrote for his wife Patti, and which Frank Sinatra later described as “the greatest love song of the past 50 years.” Sadly, any joy George might have taken from those words would soon be tempered when Sinatra took to describing his live version of the song as a Lennon/McCartney composition. “He was very old by then,” Harrison is said to have retorted. “We probably all looked the same to him.”

Two days later, “I Want You (She’s So Heavy)” was approached for the first time, a veritable Lennon leviathan that would be subject to any number of overdubbed guitar lines before it finally sounded as “massive” as the band demanded. How fitting, then, that McCartney had already decided upon a title for the album. It would be called Everest.

Tape operator John Kurlander told Beatles chronicler Mark Lewisohn, “It was around July, when it was very hot outside, that someone mentioned the possibility of the four of them taking a private plane over to the foothills of Mount Everest to shoot the cover photograph. But as they became more enthusiastic about the LP, someone — I don’t remember whom — suggested, ‘Look, I can’t be bothered to schlep all the way over to the Himalayas for a cover; why don’t we just go outside, take the photo there, call the LP Abbey Road and have done with it?”

A legend was christened.

Stay tuned for Part 2: Rough Start!

Related Posts:

Posted in ArticlesComments (1)

Inside the making of The Beatles’ ‘Abbey Road’ Part 2


By  Dave Thompson

This photo was taken around the time of Abbey Road. The Beatles brought back George Martin to produce Abbey Road. Apple Corps and EMI are releasing a remasterd version of the album, along with the rest of The Beatles catalog, on CD later this year. (© Apple Corps Ltd., 2009)

This photo was taken around the time of Abbey Road. The Beatles brought back George Martin to produce Abbey Road. Apple Corps and EMI are releasing a remasterd version of the album, along with the rest of The Beatles catalog, on CD later this year. (© Apple Corps Ltd., 2009)
Rough start

Despite such promising beginnings, the sessions were not carefree, at least this early in.

Engineer Phil McDonald informed Lewisohn, “You didn’t want to get involved, but people would be walking out, banging instruments down, not turning up on time and keeping the others waiting three or four hours, then blaming each other for not having rehearsed, or not having played their bit right.”

Recording “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer,” according to Lennon, was an especial chore — and he wasn’t even present for the session. He had recently been involved in a car accident and was still recovering at the time, “ … but I believe [Paul] really ground George and Ringo into the ground recording it. We spent more money on that song than any of them on the whole album, I think.” And what did they get out of it? Looking back from the mid-1970s, Lennon sneered, “a typical McCartney single, or whatever.”

It was only as the album came together and the quartet realized just how monumental it was becoming that, as Harrison later explained, “Things got a bit more positive. We did actually perform more like musicians again.”

“It was a very happy record,” producer George Martin agreed. “I guess it was happy because everybody thought it was going to be the last.”

Like the old days

Overseeing the sessions, Martin himself was allegedly still smarting over his virtual exclusion from many of the Let It Be recordings.

He could not, however, resist McCartney’s request that the Fab Five reunite to make an album “like we used to,” and though he would again be absent from several of the upcoming sessions, it is clear that he had a lot of magic to bring to the proceedings. He too had surely tired of the art-for-art’s sake cleverness that characterized The Beatles’ last two full albums; the countless hours spent scouring the EMI sound-effects library in search of another sound or effect that nobody had ever heard before, while John and Yoko made unintelligible noises in the guise of modern art. Abbey Road would indeed be made just like they used to.

Let It Be was such an unhappy record that I really believed that was the end of The Beatles, and I assumed I would never work with them again,” George Martin later said. “I thought, ‘What a shame to end this way.’ So I was quite surprised when Paul rang me up and said, ‘We’re going to make another record, would you like to produce it?’ My immediate answer was, ‘Only if you let me produce it the way we used to.’ He said, ‘We will, we want to.’ ‘John included?’ ‘Yes, honestly.’ So I said, ‘Let’s do it’.”

Abbey Road was a kind of Sgt. Pepper mark two,” Martin would continue. “It was innovatory, but in a more controlled way, unlike The Beatles [the White Album] and Let It Be which were a little beyond control.” A happy medium, then, which made for a very happy album.

With Chris Thomas filling Martin’s shoes on the occasions when he was not in the studio, the Moog-heavy “I Want You (She’s So Heavy)” was followed into the can by McCartney’s tribute to the harmonic pop of a decade before, “Oh! Darling,” and the latest product of Starr’s wacky pen, the aquatic whimsy of “Octopus’s Garden.”

The album was clearly taking shape, then; the only question was, what would that shape ultimately be? At this point in time, The Beatles had still to formulate any cohesive form for Abbey Road. Indeed, a report in Rolling Stone in September 1970 (that is, a full year after Abbey Road was released) insisted that an entirely different LP had been in the works, one which was to be titled Hot As Sun and whose full contents remain the stuff of speculation, as “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” and “Don’t Let Me Down” were joined by such titles as “Proud As You Are,” “Dirty Old Man” and “Zero Is Just Another Even Number.” “The Beatles Album No-one Will Ever Hear,” announced the headline, and while the putative title track would reappear as a brief instrumental on McCartney’s first solo album, McCartney, it has remained that way.

According to the story that followed, the tapes for the album were either lost, erased or stolen, and it really doesn’t matter that the entire tale was a fabrication, originally published in Elektra Records’ Touch magazine and written by Bruce and Steve Harris. It entered Beatle lore regardless, and the fiction continues to this day, on the Web site www.beatlemoney.com.

Speculating upon what might have happened had The Beatles not actually broken up, the site sees Hot As Sun piece together “tracks from Paul’s and Ringo’s [first solo LPs] as well as preview tracks from John’s and George’s pending solo albums … trying to capitalize on a rumored lost album discussed in an article in Rolling Stone magazine. [EMI] wanted to release it in time for Christmas. The Beatles blocked this effort, but a few hundred were pressed for The Beatles Fan Club and the music press.”

Yes, it’s all a joke. But where fantasy leads, reality will quickly follow. The Japanese bootleg label Junk Headz has since released an album titled Hot As Sun featuring (admittedly mistitled) versions of all the songs cited in the original report, plus a clutch more from the same period, and another LP’s worth of bonus “outtakes.” Suffice to say, the songs you’ve never previously heard of tend to be jams and snippets from the Let It Be sessions, and the remainder are nothing that you don’t own already. But it’s a fascinating collection all the same: “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” / “Don’t Let Me Down” / “Hot As Sun” / “Junk” / “Polythene Pam” / “Octopus’s Garden” / “I Should Like To Live Up A Tree”/ “Zero Is Just Another Even Number” / “What’s The New Mary Jane” / “Dirty Old Man” / “Proud As You Are” / “Watching Rainbows.” All of which would indeed have made a fascinating album. But The Beatles had far greater things in store.

Among the manifold rumors and legends that populate Beatle-land, one of the most pervasive is the suggestion that John’s original vision for the album would have segregated his songs on one side, and McCartney’s on the other (with, presumably, Starr and Harrison’s contributions squeezed someplace in between). “Even before they began,” engineer Phil McDonald told Lewisohn. “I remember John saying [that].”

Somewhere around the beginning of May, however, the notion of presenting one full side of the album as a medley hove into view. It appears to have first been mooted by George Martin: “The segues were my idea, to have a continuous piece of music. Wherever possible, we would design a song that way.” Once the idea had been floated, however, McCartney leaped upon it; indeed, it is often reported that he originally envisioned linking the entire album in that fashion, as The Beatles’ riposte to the Who’s recently unveiled Tommy rock opera.

 In any event, less ambitious heads prevailed, and a compromise was arrived at, a decision that placed the medley on Side 2 and all of the songs recorded so far onto Side 1. There they would be joined by the protracted silliness of “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” (recording of which began July 9) and the correspondingly sinister “Come Together” (July 21). In the meantime, work began on the medley, or “the Long One,” as the band referred to it during its gestation.

The first and, for a couple of months, the only song recorded for this ambitious suite (on May 6) was “You Never Give Me Your Money,” a song that McCartney wrote around the band’s dealings with their newly acquired business manager Allen Klein. McCartney told his biographer Barry Miles, “This was me directly lambasting Allen Klein’s attitude to us: no money, just funny paper, all promises and it never works out. It’s basically a song about [having] no faith in the person. John saw the humor in it.”

Despite this promising start, however, it would be early July before the band truly got to work in earnest, as “Her Majesty,” “Golden Slumbers” and another anti-Klein composition, “Carry That Weight” (beginning July 2), “The End” (July 23), “Sun King” and “Mean Mr. Mustard” (July 25), “Polythene Pam” and “She Came In Through The Bathroom Window” (July 28) and, finally, “Because” (Aug. 1) were all coaxed into being.

The side, and therefore the album, would then be completed with the addition of another Harrison song, “Here Comes The Sun,” which they began tackling early into the medley sessions, on July 7. With remixing, rerecording and overdubs taking place often within a day or two of the original recordings, and the medley itself being constructed beginning July 30, Abbey Road was finally declared complete Aug. 25, 1969, five days after the final actual recording session, completing “I Want You (She’s So Heavy)” on Aug. 20. The LP would be in the shops exactly 31 days later; the four Beatles would never be together in the studio again.

Related Posts:

Posted in ArticlesComments (0)

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Sign up to receive Goldmine's free weekly eNewsletter and get weekly updates on your favorite classic artists and the music collecting hobby!
Email:

FOLLOW US

Twitter Facebook Myspace YouTube

A LOOK INSIDE: The Spin Clean Record Washing System

Polls

Three years after Pink Floyd unveiled quadraphonic sound at a concert, the format finally arrived on records. What's your take on quadraphonic records?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

SPONSORS